Evaluating the Evaluators: Transitional Justice and the Contest of Values

International Journal of Transitional Justice

Author/s (editor/s):

Kirsten Ainley

Publication year:

2017

Publication type:

Journal article

Find this publication at:
Oxford University Press

Kirsten Ainley, Evaluating the Evaluators: Transitional Justice and the Contest of Values, International Journal of Transitional Justice, 11(3) 2017: 421-422.

Despite an increase in scholarly efforts to evaluate transitional justice (TJ) programmes, there is little agreement over what TJ is, what effects it could be expected to have or how TJ mechanisms should be judged. This article contributes to the literature on TJ evaluation by showing how differences in understanding of the nature and value of the ‘justice’ in TJ affect what is evaluated and how findings are interpreted. The article parses the values inherent in TJ evaluations (retributive, restorative and transformative justice, valuable for intrinsic or instrumental reasons) in order to think through the ways in which different value orientations lead to different appraisals. A broad sample of literature on the TJ programme in Sierra Leone is analyzed according to the value orientations it tends towards. The analysis finds that evaluations of Sierra Leonean TJ can be found displaying each of the six value orientations, with no agreement about the success of the TJ programme from within orientations, let alone across them. Additionally, it is argued that scholars and researchers are rarely explicit about their orientations, and there is insufficient consideration of the political implications of different value positions for prescriptions for future TJ programmes.

Updated:  8 March 2021/Responsible Officer:  Bell School Marketing Team/Page Contact:  CAP Web Team